Yes, 55 employees iirc. I don't think it was 'surprisingly small', though. It's just that cash-rich startups have had the habit of hiring as much as they could

Yes, 55 employees iirc. I don't think it was 'surprisingly small', though. It's just that cash-rich startups have had the habit of hiring as much as they could instead of hiring the minimum required, which is actually the sensible way to manage a company.