4 ms·
The article points to a Twitter account named Two-Word Horror. I clicked on it not expecting much, it's actually quite disturbing. Here are some examples : >
by toto444 4y ago
The article points to a Twitter account named Two-Word Horror. I clicked on it not expecting much, it's actually quite disturbing.
Here are some examples :
> Riemann counterexamples
> Unicode Corporation
> Google Sex
> procedurally-generated regulations
> denim skin
> peak humanity
- walrus01 4y ago> Facebook-Meta Landlord
- rogual 4y ago> Unicode Corporation There is an Emoji Corporation [1], which as far as I can tell exists to try and trick people into thinking they've got to pay them to use emojis. Looks like they got some Danegeld out of Sony Pictures for the Emoji movie. [1] https://www.emoji.com/ https://www.emoji.com/
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 4y agoFirst thought was how a big movie studio could be duped by that, especially for such a large project. > We are the exclusive rights owner of the registered emoji® trademark ”We own the word and they used it!” Playground logic from adults. Of course there are legitimate use-cases for a trademark but this is pretty plainly not one of those.