3 ms·
They're arguing that Stable Diffusion doesn't violate copyright law, so Getty doesn't have a case. You seem to be saying that existing copyright law is no longe
by lern_too_spel 4y ago
They're arguing that Stable Diffusion doesn't violate copyright law, so Getty doesn't have a case. You seem to be saying that existing copyright law is no longer sufficient. You're talking past each other.