> I didn't say that there couldn't be negative disagreement. > What's the problem? What's the actual problem? You're not as personable as you think you are wi

> I didn't say that there couldn't be negative disagreement. > What's the problem? What's the actual problem? You're not as personable as you think you are with such a confrontational attitude towards feedback on a website you support. The website is distracting to enough folks that it matters. Period. I'm not sure I understand the weird fan crowd we have here for the site in question. This thread is rife with folks who are ecstatic to defend the author for exercising artistic license, yet incapable of understanding or receiving valid feedback on said artistic license. And these folks aren't even the author! If you put it in public, anything is fair game. > if you really care the tools are available to it yourself. I cared enough to leave feedback for the author, I'm not going to go out of my way to read text peppered with distracting weeb shit. I don't expect folks to sift through my unusual interests to get to my points.