5 ms·
I agree, but I wonder if it's on purpose. I found the repo[1] and it's very small readme says it's a "Chess visualization exercise" So I'm wondering if it's a
by spicybright 4y ago
I agree, but I wonder if it's on purpose.
I found the repo[1] and it's very small readme says it's a "Chess visualization exercise"
So I'm wondering if it's an extreme exercise in memorization to help you visualize games better.
(I'm just talking out my butt here, I know nothing about chess puzzles)
[1]: https://github.com/jairtrejo/knight-moves https://github.com/jairtrejo/knight-moves
- hgsgm 4y agowhy would I practice visualizing not-chess information about chess pieces, when I could visualize actual chess information? The history of a pieces moves is irrelevant to chess, except in extreme corner cases of repetition.
- soperj 4y agoIt is, because you need to get to the square that's indicated, not any random square.
- gus_massa 4y agoThey should highlight the target square in the board instead of only writing it in the "clock".
- JumpCrisscross 4y ago> should highlight the target square in the board instead of only writing it in the "clock". If it's a visualization exercise, they should not. Gaining intuition for notation is strangely enabling, particularly if you have an algebraic mind.
- fsckboy 4y agoyes, i have an algebraic mind, and I find it easy to visual where the squares are, and if you say "N-KP4", I'm Johnny-on-the-spot! now, what's this a-b-c stuff?
- chongli 4y agoN-KP4 is descriptive notation [1] which was the standard notation used in chess until about 1980. Ne4 is algebraic notation [2] which is the standard notation used in chess today (since 1980). [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Descriptive_notation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Descriptive_notation [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebraic_notation_(chess) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebraic_notation_(chess)
- jessaustin 4y agoI'm relieved to see that the following is included at that link: The term "algebraic notation" may be considered a misnomer, as the system is unrelated to algebra.
- II2II 4y agoIt depends upon what you are trying to visualize. If you are trying to visualize the pattern of the knight's moves, e.g. how to reach a specific square using a sequence of moves, then highlighting the target would be more valuable. The displacement matters, not the absolute positions. The absolute positions are more of a hindrance since it makes it more difficult to generalize the sequence of moves.
- 4y ago
- b4je7d7wb 4y agoThat's how I took it as well. Everyone talks about highlighting stuff but you don't get highlights in real games. I got more comfortable with knight manouvers and chess notation thanks to this puzzle. It should definitely have some visual tutorial for people to understand how it works though.
- ak_111 4y agoStill doesn't make it sense from a UX perspective. You can make it an option to highlight the square or just show coordinates and cater for both crowds.
- xg15 4y agoAh ok! If this is part of some sort of chess training course, this would make sense. Sadly, HN is really bad at presenting context for a submission.