3 ms·
Except it's not, as the article goes on to explain: he does not want attention, he's not part of the attention economy (any more, as he assures us), he just wan
by luckylion 4y ago
Except it's not, as the article goes on to explain: he does not want attention, he's not part of the attention economy (any more, as he assures us), he just wants to hang out with people like him, of which there are "thousands, not millions".
And the attention economy is "threatened" because "thousands" want to do something else?
With these kinds of posts I always get the feeling that the people leaving Twitter (leaving, you hear me, I'M LEAVING) and swearing how they never wanted any of that attention economy thing and being the center of attention is the least of all things they'd ever want ... spend a lot of time being offended when someone suggests that their new favorite community will not replace Twitter. Twitter is no longer part of their identity, now Mastodon is, and therefore Twitter is old and terrible and people who don't think Mastodon is the greatest thing are doing it for bad reasons, and they must explain to everyone why that is. Because they must reassure themselves that they are right?
- noodleman 4y ago> Twitter is no longer part of their identity, now Mastodon is And this is why so many people are put off. The Mastodon die-hards are ready to defend Mastodon from any perceived insults. So that when people have genuine questions or issues, it's like you're insulting the users themselves. It doesn't help that Mastodon fans heavily evangelise the tech, as if anyone other than tech bros care. "What do you mean there's no good content on Mastodon? You blah blah blah decentralised blah blah blah fediverse..." So back to Twitter/Reddit/Facebook people go, where you can get your dopamine fix within about 2 seconds.