3 ms·
I think that's more of an issue with 'hidden city ticketing'/deliberately missing connections, because it's cheaper than buying a ticket to the layover location
by NickNameNick 4y ago
I think that's more of an issue with 'hidden city ticketing'/deliberately missing connections, because it's cheaper than buying a ticket to the layover location.
- jaywalk 4y agoYeah, airlines don't like that at all. Doing it once is highly unlikely to result in any action, but you're playing with fire either way.
- SilasX 4y agoRight. It’s an issue when you buy a ticket from A to C with an A-B and B-C leg, and you get off in B. The ticket might be cheaper (than A-B) because the airline is competing with a direct A-C flight. But if it’s just A-B and B-A and you don’t take the return flight, no one cares. (I’ve even gotten flack for notifying the airline as a courtesy…)
- pxx 4y agoFor one-way markets what you have is true. For round-trip markets, typically internationally, what you have is not. E.g. LAX-NRT on 3/2 on UA 32 is $966 right now. Add a return flight on 3/9 and the flight _drops_ to $893. I'd be surprised any airline gave you flak for telling them you were missing a segment. They might try to charge you more (!).
- dwaite 4y ago> I'd be surprised any airline gave you flak for telling them you were missing a segment. They might try to charge you more (!). They do indeed, including trip change fees. For myself, I luckily got an agent who was nice enough to ignore what I had told her.