3 ms·

I also didn't like the abstract. It feels more like what the introduction section of the paper should be. Instead here they should summarize what their key find

• musicale 4y ago
  Academic papers shouldn't read like mystery novels or vague, pointless ramblings. If the abstract doesn't describe or summarize any notable results or contributions, a reader might (very reasonably) assume that there aren't any. The last line of the abstract does seem to be relevant: > This work consists on (sic) an attempt to describe in a concise way the main models are (sic) sectors that are affected by generative AI and to provide a taxonomy of the main generative models published recently. I think the authors may have meant something like: "This work presents a concise overview of generative AI models and their application areas, and provides a taxonomy of recently published generative models." They could have gone on to explain that the models are categorized by input and output type.