> Specific to this case, is there a good argument for not requiring that the method of slaughter is public? That's an interesting idea. Unfortunately, there wi

> Specific to this case, is there a good argument for not requiring that the method of slaughter is public? That's an interesting idea. Unfortunately, there will likely be bad arguments ("I don't want to watch that!" ignoring the rebuttal of, "Don't watch it?") which become annoyingly persistent. Then "workarounds" like fake camera feeds. Still, requiring that this is auditable by the general public doesn't sound bad on its face when it's considered that the general public is eating the things being audited.