4 ms·
> civilized people don't regard Naziism as a valid topic for disagreement see how fluidly you move between naziism as an analogy and asserting that it has a li
by fidgewidge 4y ago
> civilized people don't regard Naziism as a valid topic for disagreement
see how fluidly you move between naziism as an analogy and asserting that it has a literal meaning such that the "war" about that has been over for decades? nobody here is a literal nazi not even close, so this whole argument is meaningless.
> the people who do not like assholes stop coming around
the whole point is that actually no, it is possible for people to strongly disagree yet stay talking and adults do so all the time.
- tarotuser 4y agoI personally have ousted a nazi (her words for her identity) from multiple nonprofit board positions. She also worked with the synagogue bomber in Northern Indiana, who is also a nazi, and found guilty. Although it is true that "nazi" was historically thrown around a LOT, especially during the 90's and earlier 2000's, with things like "Soup Nazi" and grammar nazies. Charlottesville was really the wakeup call that no, there are real white nationalists, neonazies, and similar, and they will attempt to take over at all costs. And in the occult, there is Norse religion called Asatru - or faith of the Aesir. Unfortunately, groups like "Asatru Folk Assembly" are literally neonazi front groups, that peddle Asatru but with a racial purity identity. The anti-racist Asatruars have had to fight against real neonazies getting your group, "peacefully" suggesting racial purity, inviting more like them and running off the anti-racists... And after a bit, your group is now a neonazi front. This is a literal thing that happens. These types are not to be tolerated, discussed with, or anything outside of running them off the moment they appear.