> I hope you are being coherent with your words and are already doing this. How do you feel about people who say to protestors, "if you don't like it here, mov

> I hope you are being coherent with your words and are already doing this. How do you feel about people who say to protestors, "if you don't like it here, move"? You're peddling the same logical fallacy that conservative billionaires have convinced the lower-middle class of for a century. OP proposes a trade: their high salary for a society that prioritizes the wellbeing of everyone over the wellbeing of the luckiest few. In response, you suggest that OP should give away half their salary to another individual, and they've solved their problem. The fallacy here is that you assume assume OP's goal is to be purely selfless; that is not the case. OP very selfishly wants to live in a healthier, more sustainable society than they currently do. In response, you disingenuously suggest that they take all of the negatives of their the trade with none of the positives. Hopefully you see why that's not helpful to anyone.