>> We’ve decided to reduce our workforce by approximately 12,000 roles. When I first read this I saw the word “role” and not “jobs” and therefore interpreted i

>> We’ve decided to reduce our workforce by approximately 12,000 roles. When I first read this I saw the word “role” and not “jobs” and therefore interpreted it as more than 12,000 jobs, because a role can be one or more people. By that definition however it’s absurd to think that that many roles would be eliminated. Why didn’t they just say “jobs”?