4 ms·
Doesn't make sense at all. Maybe they identified a larger pool of employees and then applied random selection algorithm to that pool. No way they are laying off
by b0sk 4y ago
Doesn't make sense at all. Maybe they identified a larger pool of employees and then applied random selection algorithm to that pool. No way they are laying off superstars.
- orra 4y ago> No way they are laying off superstars. Shrug. Superstars cost more. Besides, companies don't love superstars do they? They want replaceable commodities.
- luckylion 4y agoThey'll settle for commodities, but they want results. "Superstars" are great, because they'll get you results. You don't want to rely on having someone do the work of a whole team, but you certainly won't fire them, even if they cost three times as much as one of the ten people they replace.