There should be some culpability and at the very least reputational damage for whoever decided to install such a system in the first place. I’m guessing it was

There should be some culpability and at the very least reputational damage for whoever decided to install such a system in the first place. I’m guessing it was the architect. The decision to layer in a system like this was clearly done without considering how it might fail, how it would be supported, and the strength of the vendor it was being bought from. These all strike me as 101 level procurement questions that were probably overlooked in favor of slapping a “green” label on the building. And for what? LED lighting is pretty damned efficient, and there are plenty of approaches to curbing unnecessary lighting use that don’t introduce a massively complex system to the mix.