3 ms·
I think the way things are going nuclear war is likely, and the worse part is may be not fully intentional. I think nuclear war is survivable if you are in a g
by rdevsrex 4y ago
I think the way things are going nuclear war is likely, and the worse part is may be not fully intentional.
I think nuclear war is survivable if you are in a good location and already prepped to survive 2+ years on your preps and have the means to grow all your own food and are in a solid community that doesn't go bonkers after shtf.
But that's not the vast majority of us, so it would be quite the shit show. If you aren't prepped, I don't know why someone would want to survive the attack.
- empathy_m 4y agoSo what's your plan -- do you live somewhere that's unlikely to get a direct hit and do you have the food and gear ready?
- tablespoon 4y ago> I think nuclear war is survivable if you are in a good location and already prepped to survive 2+ years on your preps and have the means to grow all your own food and are in a solid community that doesn't go bonkers after shtf. If that's the criteria, it's survivable by practically no one. I mean, there won't be any "solid communities" left if you need 2+ years of stored food to survive, since practically no one has that.
- midoridensha 4y agoSome places far from the northern countries taking part in that war will probably be survivable: think South Africa or Argentina and maybe Australia/NZ.
- tablespoon 4y ago> Some places far from the northern countries taking part in that war will probably be survivable: think South Africa or Argentina and maybe Australia/NZ. Yeah, but the OP seemed to be talking about targeted countries. I just think he was setting his minimum "prepping" in a contradictory way that spelled doom. Also, those southern countries may be severely affected, since the big northern countries are also big (staple) food exporters.