3 ms·
> that gives some sliders to users to vote on the allocation? A lot of charities tend to side with one political affiliation or the other. When people see %not
by kylehotchkiss 4y ago
> that gives some sliders to users to vote on the allocation?
A lot of charities tend to side with one political affiliation or the other. When people see %not their political affiliations% charity, they take it personally, and try to boycott the service. So this might do more harm than good.
- antiterra 4y agoTrue, but the evil PR goal here is to eventually decomisison the sliders and just say that Amazon participates in philanthropy without generating a bad headline/sentiment. I think they could find neutral enough charities in the meantime, such as those for specific health conditions, habitat for humanity, etc