4 ms·
> Without fossil fuel subsidies for agriculture mass starvation is certain. Without fossile fuels for agriculture, starvation is certain. Without fossile fuel
by geysersam 4y ago
> Without fossil fuel subsidies for agriculture mass starvation is certain.
Without fossile fuels for agriculture, starvation is certain. Without fossile fuel subsidies, we'd just pay a bit more for food and slightly less for other things.
- Nifty3929 4y agoAnd possibly not pay more for food either, given that there are often prices floors or other similar things. Remember that we usually have a vast surplus of food in the US. The govt at one point was running massive warehouses to store cheese, as a way to keep up milk prices. This is the origin of “government cheese.”
- danuker 4y ago> government cheese TIL. See also: council juice
- 5e92cb50239222b 4y agoMany people in my country are already paying around half of their earnings for food. You can't really go much above that before dying of starvation.
- bigfudge 4y agoOr substantial social changes. Rents and other costs would presumably need to change if this affected a majority? Edit: what I’m pointing to is that hunger is often in the context of sufficiency.
- inglor_cz 4y agoDon't forget the fact that a few nations export massive surpluses of food. If the global trade chain is disrupted, their customers simply won't have enough food to eat. Most famines in the last 100 years were at least partially caused by an inability to supply food from neighboring or just slightly more distant regions.
- geysersam 4y agoLet's not pretend the food production subsidies are there for some kind of altruistic reasons. They're mostly there because of lobbyism. There are also people who say that the overproduction of food in EU and US causes underproduction of food in poorer countries, making them less self sufficient and more sensitive to price increases and supply chain disruptions.
- arka2147483647 4y agoI believe the intent was to say that Fertilizers made from Fossile Fuels subsidize the Nutrients in the ground. That is, the ground itself cannot support the amount of food we grow, unless we, the humans, subsidise the ground with fertilizers.
- sklargh 4y agoThis was a reference to energy system subsidies, not financial. Diesel for combines or natural gas for fertilizer.