3 ms·
I don't understand the argument. Imply without data that 90% of a mailing list works for Google, and further imply that their involvement with an open standar
by akira2501 4y ago
I don't understand the argument. Imply without data that 90% of a mailing list works for Google, and further imply that their involvement with an open standard is actually a ploy to secretly benefit their advertising business?
That doesn't seem very much like a "high road" to me.
- calibas 4y ago> Imply without data that 90% of a mailing list works for Google... Not what the article says. Here's the exact statement: "most of the people on that mailing list work either for or with Google" > and further imply that their involvement with an open standard is actually a ploy to secretly benefit their advertising business Also not what the article says. It's implied there's a conflict of interest, which is true, but not some kind of secret ploy.