4 ms·
Absolutely. And this is a mere request from them, not something they can actually tell their customers. Apple is the sole judge on whether you shall receive a r
by yokoprime 4y ago
Absolutely. And this is a mere request from them, not something they can actually tell their customers. Apple is the sole judge on whether you shall receive a refund. The actual maker is not involved in that process.
- kelnos 4y agoIt's still kinda gross, IMO. Twitterific should be pro-actively refunding customers for the unused portion of their subscriptions, without users having to request one from Apple. Twitterific made a bet that the Twitter API would remain available to them. They should be the ones assuming the risk and taking on the consequences of losing that bet. Not their customers.
- ceejayoz 4y ago> Twitterific should be pro-actively refunding customers for the unused portion of their subscriptions... It's my understanding that Apple doesn't offer this feature.
- Me1000 4y agoThis is correct, they couldn't do it if they wanted to. Sometimes Apple Dev Relations will help out and mass refund without making all the users request a refund, but they don't always (even when the developer asks).