4 ms·
Sure, but doesn’t that weaken the proof? It is an arbitrary restriction on the function that is required
by thehappypm 4y ago
Sure, but doesn’t that weaken the proof? It is an arbitrary restriction on the function that is required
- mannerheim 4y agoBarely? It proves it for the principal root, and you can trivially prove it for the negative root using the principal root's irrationality.