I don't disagree, it could be construed as an invitation to a superficial assessment. The point of the algorithm mentioned in my comment is not that it gives c

I don't disagree, it could be construed as an invitation to a superficial assessment. The point of the algorithm mentioned in my comment is not that it gives correct results, it's that it's one possible entree into a guessing game, "who is this person?". It's the specificity of the particular items, which provide a definite set of branches for further questions, falsifications, etc. Many people play the same game, in effect, with "what do you do" (your job), or "where do you live", or "where did you go to high school [college]". I kind of prefer the materialist formulation for a change of pace.