2 ms·
You're tone policing, and you did imply that Schwab's outlook is guided by half-century old intuitions and called into question his cognitive abilities, basing
by stakhanov 4y ago
You're tone policing, and you did imply that Schwab's outlook is guided by half-century old intuitions and called into question his cognitive abilities, basing both on nothing but his age. That is ageist. How do you know he's not open-minded and up-to-date on all the latest research?
- uoaei 4y agoI am not making a positive argument in the opposite direction. This is not a debate. I am stating obvious facts and simple conjectures to make clear just how narrow-minded and apparently intentionally oblivious the original analysis is. Also, the HN guidelines are already tone-policing. I am not really tone-policing because I don't want the person above to say what they're already saying but nicer. I want them to acknowledge just how narrow and clouded their reasoning is due to the apparent outrage, and how to take an edge off of what apparently was a very bad start to a day for someone.