3 ms·
The article does not suggest that users should not have the power to be programmers, it suggests that the organization benefits from wrapping programming in cer
by raganwald 15y ago
The article does not suggest that users should not have the power to be programmers, it suggests that the organization benefits from wrapping programming in certain risk management practices and that this is just as applicable to duck programming as it is to code programming.
- demallien 15y agoHeh. I'm fighting against the introduction of a duck programming system at the moment. My cunning plan is to make the system generate source code from the config files. That makes it clear that modifying XML is the same thing as modifying source code, because it explicitly makes modified source code that then needs to be deployed. I may have to post the results on HN :)