4 ms·

You could have checked the actual publication. The answer is right in the abstract: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.ade4809 https://www.science.org/d

You could have checked the actual publication. The answer is right in the abstract: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.ade4809 https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.ade4809

aaron_m04 4y ago
Sure, but why not link to that instead of the NYT article?
- flobosg 4y ago
  Because the NYT article, as opposed to the paper, addresses a wider audience and is written in layman’s terms. Furthermore, if you are curious about the primary source, the NYT piece links to it early on.