5 ms·
That is a nice feature of dynamic languages, however you lose strong typing. I think the thing to take away is Scala hasn't gotten the perfect blend of these tw
by dkhenry 15y ago
That is a nice feature of dynamic languages, however you lose strong typing. I think the thing to take away is Scala hasn't gotten the perfect blend of these two yet. You can't make that competly generic map filtering extension yet. However you can make a less portable alternative. So you make you decision on what is more important.
- cgh 15y agoJust to be pedantic, you lose static typing. Ruby (and Python, etc.) are strongly, dynamically typed languages.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- jobeirne 15y ago> however you lose strong typing You lose static typing; strong typing is different: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strong_typing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strong_typing