4 ms·
It's simple. All predictions and models have failed to date. They have 1000+ climate models, and every couple years take and promote the best performing ones to
by aquarium87 4y ago
It's simple. All predictions and models have failed to date. They have 1000+ climate models, and every couple years take and promote the best performing ones to give the illusion of credibility. In reality, past performance is not an indicator of future performance.
A more simplistic gold standard approach says just look at sea level rise, and it's relatively flat at about 3mm per year, or a foot per century.
The entire climate industry relies on unproven, highly speculative feedback loops that unsuccessfully attempt to model the effects of moisture in the air.
- melling 4y agoNOPE, THAT WOULD BE WRONG! In fact, even Exxon had good models 50 years ago https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2023/01/12/business/exxon-climate-models-global-warming/index.html https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2023/01/12/business/exxon-climate-mo... Remember, when people like yourself couldn’t imagine how 1 million Americans could die from coronavirus? “more people died from blah blah blah, than coronavirus “ That went on for about a year, then the message turned to be “there’s nothing we could’ve done “
- thinking4real 4y agoNgl, for someone who’s gloating so much - you sent some crummy cnn article which didn’t show any theory or model, much less one being correct