3 ms·
> Did you read the post? Yes, which is why I cited specific details from the post in my comment. I also read some of his other posts which is where I gathered
by PragmaticPulp 4y ago
> Did you read the post?
Yes, which is why I cited specific details from the post in my comment.
I also read some of his other posts which is where I gathered the “monastic code machine” and additional context.
Please don’t jump to conclusions about other people not reading the post when they’re clearly referring to details within.
HN has a guideline about this specifically https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
> Please don't comment on whether someone read an article. "Did you even read the article? It mentions that" can be shortened to "The article mentions that".
- newsiehey 4y agoI didn't jump to a conclusion hence the question mark. It's seemed valid since your response whiffs on his conclusion and go off on your own unrelated tangent. Calling him a clever name and espousing some unsolicited drivel... You don't sound like you are relating at all