3 ms·
The short version is that overlapping maritime borders are resolved by drawing the various buffer zones out from the shoreline of all coastal land of each count
by mattficke 4y ago
The short version is that overlapping maritime borders are resolved by drawing the various buffer zones out from the shoreline of all coastal land of each country, and where they conflict take the approximate midpoint of the overlapping area as the border.
Small islands can therefore have an outsized impact on extending the territorial waters of a country, which is why there are so many territorial disputes over seemingly-insignificant uninhabited islands.
There's not always an unambiguous resolution to competing claims, see for example:
- China's "nine-dash line" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nine-dash_line https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nine-dash_line
- The Israeli–Lebanese maritime border dispute (which was only resolved last year) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli%E2%80%93Lebanese_maritime_border_dispute https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli%E2%80%93Lebanese_marit...
- midasuni 4y agoSure, Rockal being one controversial claim. but in reality if new land appeared in the middle of the English Channel on the French side, I can’t imagine the U.K. being happy with suddenly losing a fair bit of EEZ. China can get away with it because might makes right.