3 ms·

> We are not payed what we are worth. We are payed what the company can get away with. Is there a big difference between the two in a free market? How exactly

• serverholic 4y ago
  Worth and value are inherently subjective. Price is an attempt to assign an objective value to something subjective. It kinda/sorta works, but it also kinda doesn't. Let's imagine there is no minimum wage in America. Now let's say that workers in America demand $10/hour and African workers ask for $2/hour for the exact same job. What's the correct value for that labor? It's a non-sensical question. You could say it's the minimum value at $2. But then some other worker asks for $1. Did you make a mistake? Was it not actually worth $2 the whole time?
  • hbrn 4y ago
    > Worth and value are inherently subjective If they are inherently subjective, why are you claiming we're not paid what we're worth? This statement is meaningless, isn't it? > It kinda/sorta works, but it also kinda doesn't In what way it doesn't work? Clearly it has more utility than other attempts at measuring value. I can agree it's not perfect (nothing is), but that's very different from not working. > let's say that workers in America demand $10/hour and African workers ask for $2/hour for the exact same job. What's the correct value for that labor? The correct value is whatever someone is paying for that labor on a free market. > You could say it's the minimum value at $2. But then some other worker asks for $1. Did you make a mistake? The only mistake is treating value as inherent and static.