4 ms·
We don't rely on any 3rd party APIs in order to keep serving costs down (which is necessary to keep this as a free service). We only use permissively licensed p
by varunkmohan 4y ago
We don't rely on any 3rd party APIs in order to keep serving costs down (which is necessary to keep this as a free service). We only use permissively licensed public code to train.
- jen20 4y agoWhat counts as permissively licensed? The FAQ is mealy-mouthed about this.
- NicoleJO 4y agoHe won't answer because he's following OpenAI's criminal footsteps.
- RockRobotRock 4y agoTotally unbiased opinion from someone who sells their own GPT-like software.
- NicoleJO 4y agoThere's no GPT in my software, nor does it work like it. Anything else you care to be wrong about?
- RockRobotRock 4y agoOh, I see that you're actually suing GitHub and OpenAI, it all makes sense now. TOTALLY not biased in any way!
- NicoleJO 4y agoCongratulations! You're WRONG AGAIN! LoL It's not my lawsuit :-)
- RockRobotRock 4y ago"We’ve filed a lawsuit challenging GitHub Copilot" from your Twitter account, but okay. https://twitter.com/JOSourcing/status/1588296106554716160?s=20 https://twitter.com/JOSourcing/status/1588296106554716160?s=...
- RockRobotRock 4y agoI'm sorry i didnt realize you were just quoting the page
- NicoleJO 4y agoOh, and don't bother responding to me again. I won't answer.
- elorm 4y agoWhat happened to operating in good faith on this platform? That's such a mean comment to make on such a lighthearted topic.
- NicoleJO 4y agoThis person had ample opportunity to answer the question. But he didn't, just like the other thieves who don't answer questions about the legality of their datasets. It's a pattern.
- jeroenhd 4y agoReading the FAQ it seems to come down "people copy/paste from publicly available code anyway so who cares. We'll look into attribution in the future maybe". I've never read an FAQ that avoids it's own questions this much. They say "permissive licenses", they could've just listed what licenses were deemed acceptable by their scraper. Licenses like WTFPL, MIT-0 or CC0 are perfectly usable for ML because they require nothing in exchange for the code. There are projects out there using these licenses, though most will require attribution at the very least. Microsoft went full "licenses don't apply to machine learning, sue us", just like most AI companies when it comes to things like copyright, but I don't think claiming to care about licenses and then refusing to name any permissable licenses for your model is much better. At least MS doesn't lie about their intentions.
- jen20 4y agoIndeed - I would argue it is _much_ worse.
- honkler 4y agobe explicit about it. what is "permissively licensed"?
- bombolo 4y agoMIT license still has the copyright notice requirement…