4 ms·
> At least that’s what I’ve heard; I don’t really know how holograms work. Followed by a number of paragraphs incorrectly comparing things in code to his incor
by daeken 15y ago
> At least that’s what I’ve heard; I don’t really know how holograms work.
Followed by a number of paragraphs incorrectly comparing things in code to his incorrect model of how holograms work. Come now, I'm sure we can talk about things like code without having to compare against things we don't even know about. Or, at the very least, we can read a wikipedia article beforehand...
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- ajross 15y agoHis understanding of holograms was incomplete, but not incorrect. His summary at the top ("information about each small area of image is scattered throughout the holograph. You can’t say this little area of the hologram corresponds to this little area of the image.") is just fine as far as it goes. It's just a metaphor. Maybe it's a bad one, but if it is then you have to make that case, not argue against it based on a technicality.