3 ms·
> combined with ChatGPT we could even make those automatic getting-back-in-touch messages indistinguishable from the manual ones extending this bit further - w
by rytis 4y ago
> combined with ChatGPT we could even make those automatic getting-back-in-touch messages indistinguishable from the manual ones
extending this bit further - we might as well reply with chatGPT. then it's chatGPT all the way down, who needs human interaction when we tick the boxes of "I called them" and "I replied"?.. :)
- MisterPea 4y agoThis is exactly what happened in the show Silicon Valley with Dinesh and Gilfoyle's AI
- natpalmer1776 4y agoIn this situation, neither party need be aware that the other party is 'antisocial' in this regard. The way I see it, the following situations apply for a tool that produces communication indistinguishable from the user's own writing (AI)... "AI" for the following cases would be beneficial: Social -> Antisocial Social <- Antisocial "AI" for the following cases would be net neutral: Antisocial -> Antisocial Antisocial <- Antisocial And finally "AI" would be inapplicable (since neither party would use it) in the following cases: Social -> Social Social <- Social In this drastically simplified model, there aren't any cases where the existence of a sufficiently competent AI would be detrimental to any party involved, while still providing value for those who choose to use it.