3 ms·
> So there's your number. A CEO taking zero would cover less than 400 employees. That's not our number at all. GP said "executives" which includes a lot more t
by culi 4y ago
> So there's your number. A CEO taking zero would cover less than 400 employees.
That's not our number at all. GP said "executives" which includes a lot more than the CEOs. For all I know 1% of the company could be executives
- onlyrealcuzzo 4y agoWell, I told you how many "execs" are at MSFT. It's 19 out of >200k employees - so there's 100x less execs than your guess.