3 ms·

Problem is Facebook and Instagram are global entities.

• klyrs 4y ago
  And yet they don't censor women who aren't in hijab. Should you be using facebook and instagram at work? I know I don't.
  • psychphysic 4y ago
    Where do you think they should draw the line as a business case? I see a pretty obvious line allowing women without a hijab but not what might be considered child porn (girls topless). Unless you're suggesting that topless girls goes from fine as a baby to not okay as a teen to fine as an adult? > Should you be using facebook and instagram at work? I'm allowed to browse at work. But not watch what they consider pornographic.
    • klyrs 4y ago
      The line between nudity and pornography is indeed blurry; in fact there is pornography out there without any nudity at all. I can go down to the beach (were it not the depths of winter, I guess) and see naked people of all ages and that's not pornographic or even sexual. I live in the luxury of not being responsible for one-size-fits-all policies to be applied world-wide.
      • psychphysic 4y ago
        So as a business case where would you draw the line? Considering Facebook user demographic, countries its revenue comes from. I get the feeling people are trying to use Facebook to enact some sort of societal change.
        • klyrs 4y ago
          > So as a business case where would you draw the line? I thought I addressed that: I'm grateful to not be in that position. Moreover, I do not think that it's a good thing for a single company to have consolidated power over the communications of the entire world as facebook has. If I were so situated, I would break them up.