5 ms·
Interesting. I've been working on a side project that combines argument mapping with actual syntax checking - meaning that if an argument's conclusion is purpor
by tunesmith 4y ago
Interesting. I've been working on a side project that combines argument mapping with actual syntax checking - meaning that if an argument's conclusion is purported to be "proven" via the sufficiency of its premises and sub premises, then a counterpoint further down in the graph will notify the conclusion that its truth value is now in doubt. I wonder if it could use argdown as an input method.
- mistermann 4y agoAre you working on this out in the open? I'd be very interested to see what it looks like and where you're planning to go with it.
- tunesmith 4y agoYeah, maybe I should. I've thought about doing a stream on it for a while. It's a fun mix of actors, react, graph viz, and philosophy.
- xcdzvyn 4y agoDo you stream at all currently? I'll keep an eye on your Twitch etc. if you're planning on streaming this stuff. I'm also very interested.
- mistermann 4y agoWell if there's any way to find out if you do reveal anything I'd love to know because this sounds very interesting and novel.
- djokkataja 4y agoThat sounds interesting; the weakness of the examples provided with Argdown is that they come to a conclusion, but they don't indicate why that conclusion was chosen over the other option, and it's not clear that the conclusions actually address everything.