3 ms·
It sounds like we got different things from the article. That part that stood out to me was > The posts were flagged by users, then reviewed and removed by an
by kelseyfrog 4y ago
It sounds like we got different things from the article.
That part that stood out to me was
> The posts were flagged by users, then reviewed and removed by an AI system.
To me this says that we're talking about a system that involves people who are telegraphing their dislike of nipple content. I agree with you that advertisers may have reservations about the content, but in this story advertisers aren't mentioned, only users who dislike nipple content are. Maybe there's something I'm missing, but I can't see a connection between advertisers not wanting to be associated with the content in a way that causes people to report nipple pictures.
- mrguyorama 4y agoRemember that the US still has a rather large population of religious and otherwise extremely socially conservative people. These people are against uncovered breasts in general, and it makes them extremely angry. They also tend to be well organized, persistent, and have enough smart people to be a problem. Pornhub being thrown off of credit card payment systems was mostly the doing of an anti-porn religious organization. That's what these brands are afraid of. Conservatives bitching about "cancel culture" have NOTHING on the wrath of religious folks if you step outside their prescribed notions of the world. Remember, people BOMBED abortion clinics, like, not rarely either.