> Strongly suspect that Carmack said "air quality" sloppily and meant specifically the oxygen aspect of it. Then how is his comment topical or even interestin

> Strongly suspect that Carmack said "air quality" sloppily and meant specifically the oxygen aspect of it. Then how is his comment topical or even interesting? It sure sounds like he's wading into the indoor air quality debate that ignited (pun intended) around gas stoves in the last week. But as others have noted, he's a "great man" so his opinions, well informed or not, get broadcast.