> AI is too important to be left to a cabal of "specialists" You do realize you're arguing against yourself, right? "Cabal of specialists" could also apply to

> AI is too important to be left to a cabal of "specialists" You do realize you're arguing against yourself, right? "Cabal of specialists" could also apply to the people who work on AI. For profit. Information asymmetry is well known to be the main cause of market failure. How is that cabal alone better than that plus people with other specialties such as ethics, plus everyone able to watch them all and decide for themselves whether that aligns with their own (or society's) interests?