3 ms·
No, this is about acceptance of the 'hand' you have and having an understanding of what you can control and influence. Which is pretty damn empowering, compared
by twh270 4y ago
No, this is about acceptance of the 'hand' you have and having an understanding of what you can control and influence. Which is pretty damn empowering, compared to blaming structural or systemic problems for your situation.
- beecafe 4y agoThe point is to change the structure and try to address systemic problems, rather than putting on your blinders.
- int_19h 4y agoMost of us don't have any meaningful avenues to do so (although there's plenty of simulacrums if one just wants to feel like they're "doing something"). But, more importantly, it's generally not something that can be done on a timeframe that would actually benefit you and solve your immediate problem. Yes, we should be fixing systemic problems at proper scale, but meanwhile we still have to function within the current messy state of affairs.
- bluetomcat 4y agoIndividual agency is important either way, but people should be aware of its limitations when approaching wide societal problems. Collective consensus has the ability to change the rules of the game once they have become an impediment to the net "well-being" of society. And this can only be assessed when people try to jump out of their subjective experience, reasoning about the world as an outside observer.