I agree what Dr. V did is not good in any way and played with other people's trust and livelihoods, but this reporter knows she attempted suicide in the past an

I agree what Dr. V did is not good in any way and played with other people's trust and livelihoods, but this reporter knows she attempted suicide in the past and knows what he's publicly revealing will completely unravel her entire life. It's not hard to put two and two together on that one. I don't know what the solution is to make her come clean and also protect her at the same time, and you might feel that wasn't his responsibility as a third party, but that doesn't even seem like something he thought about. I'm not saying he shouldn't have come forward with the information, because it's definitely a complicated situation, not least because he spent almost an entire year researching this topic and didn't want to just throw that away. You've also got the notion of justice for the people she deceived, and the question of how damaging a lie like that is since she wasn't just a scammer but was actually committed to making a good product. But the way the article was written really felt like the author was just relishing in the idea of spreading this hot gossip and making a big story and didn't do any of this consideration beforehand. Maybe I'm reading malice into it where there isn't any because of the very flippant and callous way the author privately outed and was prepared to publicly out Dr. V.