I'm sure their premise that academics study something in isolation and extrapolate possibilities from there is problematic. But the author also focuses on pape

I'm sure their premise that academics study something in isolation and extrapolate possibilities from there is problematic. But the author also focuses on papers that study 100% renewables grid. I find it pretty annoying that people want to scuttle the first 80% renewable grid because of the problems of the last 5%. Smells like good old fossil FUD.