Is this not a superficial attempt at saftey? I would like my AI system to tell me how to hotwire a car if I am curious about how that works. I would like my A

Is this not a superficial attempt at saftey? I would like my AI system to tell me how to hotwire a car if I am curious about how that works. I would like my AI system to give me a detailed step by step car hotwire walkthrough if I am in a physically abusive relationship and my kids and I only have 30 minutes to try to hotwire the car and escape a remote area for safety. I do not want AI systems to create children's books in the style of authors that I know, for the purposes of selling books and reducing my friends' ability to have a happy productive life. Especially because it was trained on their work. I want my friends to be happy, and I have had some friends commit suicide. So maybe improving human happiness is a saftey concern, and generating kids books is not safe. But that doesn't look like "safety" from a superficial point of view. The only way for an AI to be able to make judgements on safety is for it to have general intelligence and some life experience (like we do). Because it needs to figure out context to know if it should be telling a particular person how to hotwire a car. I am being very dismissive because I don't see this as being a perfect solution, and it is easy to see why. But maybe someone who works on this can explain how an imperfect solution still has value? I am open to that possibility. Maybe self-reflection and self-tuning is of general value - even if it only superficially addresses safety concerns in a 1 dimensional way. Perhaps these techniques can be used on something other than safety.