4 ms·
So are you saying that the scam is actually ok, because in theory Amazon would refund indefinitely into the future, which wouldn't happen, because users are not
by starbugs 4y ago
So are you saying that the scam is actually ok, because in theory Amazon would refund indefinitely into the future, which wouldn't happen, because users are not asking for a refund anyway? How does this make it ok? I'm not sure if I can follow the argumentation here.
- ninth_ant 4y agoI’m not saying it’s okay. It hurts consumers — not ok - and likely hurts amazon too in the longer run. I was answering a question that someone posed — that people aren’t suing amazon because then ones who care enough to sue are instead getting their money back. What damages would they sue for? If I’m wrong and at 31 days amazon refuses to give money back for a fraudulent product like this, then perhaps there’d be basis for a lawsuit. But I’ve not heard of that happening, and I’ve read a decent number of articles about this issue.
- starbugs 4y agoYes, that was me asking the question. Thanks for the answer. I think now I understand where you're coming from. Wouldn't competitors have a good reason to sue? The damages appear obvious.