3 ms·
It sounds like something that could be automated. I know that they proactively archive certain interesting content regularly. Maybe another source of that could
by kevincox 4y ago
It sounds like something that could be automated. I know that they proactively archive certain interesting content regularly. Maybe another source of that could be feeds. They could track feeds for submitrf pages and considering subscribing to and archiving feeds that hit a certain popularity threshold.
- renegat0x0 4y agoSounds reasonable, but what if the page that you are interested is not in cross-heirs of archive.org, what if is niche? Archive.org provides API to store the pages you are interested in, it is like that by design. I think they decide what to store after all, by checking how many requests are made.
- kevincox 4y agoI'm not saying that you shouldn't archive manually as well. Just that it would be a good idea to also have detection and auto-archiving of popular feeds.