2 ms·

Here is a fun example of what it can do: https://twitter.com/jayelmnop/status/1612243602633068549 https://twitter.com/jayelmnop/status/1612243602633068549.

• armchairhacker 4y ago
  This example is way better than ChatGPT and actually pretty creative. However for some of these really good responses I always wonder if you’re example is close to one which has been given “preloaded” responses or explicit reinforcement…because if you ask ChatGPT a common question like “why did the chicken cross the road?” the model’s response seems especially unique and better than usual. Even if the specific question isn’t common, maybe it’s been trained on a more general but still reinforced category, like asking “why did the fox cross the road” would get you almost the same “preloaded” response but with chicken adjectives/verbs replaced with fox ones. I doubt Claude has been trained on Fast and Furious or movie titles specifically, but perhaps it has been explicitly trained to know what “exaggerated” responses means. Even if not, reinforcement focusing on specific areas may be a good technique for future language models.
• gs17 4y ago
  The "This Title Is Now Longer Than The Actual Movie" gag feels a bit too much like something ripped from the training set for me. I'm willing to be amazed though.