3 ms·

So they can do analysis on the logs and proactively fix vulnerabilities before they are exploited? I'm sitting here in shock wondering if you don't realize what

So they can do analysis on the logs and proactively fix vulnerabilities before they are exploited? I'm sitting here in shock wondering if you don't realize what you typed, or your implicitly saying you don't want a software company to have useful analytics to fix their product. The second option is understandable, but at least acknowledge the utility of logging. Also, I'm pretty sure you'll find detailed discussion of why people use Tailscale when there are options like vanilla Wireguard and OpenVPN if you google it or check their homepage. It fits many peoples' usecases.

Arnavion 4y ago
>I'm sitting here in shock wondering if you don't realize what you typed After you're done being shocked, maybe you should read my comment more carefully. I didn't say "Tailscale shouldn't have logging". I didn't even ask "Why does Tailscale have logging?" I asked "Why would I want to use a security product that phones home?" I don't make decisions for Tailscale. If they want to have logging, analytics or free puppies, they're welcome to. I make decisions for myself, and I've decided that I wouldn't use any security product that phones home.
- unethical_ban 4y ago
  "Why would I want to use a security product that phones home?" For all the reasons I listed, then. If you can operate more manual, less user-friendly, and difficult-to-troubleshoot software, then by all means.