4 ms·
There is no implication in the parent that you should wear a helmet when the risk of head injury is greater than zero (i.e. always). They only imply that bike-r
by happytoexplain 4y ago
There is no implication in the parent that you should wear a helmet when the risk of head injury is greater than zero (i.e. always). They only imply that bike-riding is high enough risk to warrant it.
- pkulak 4y agoThe implication that riding a bike puts you at higher risk of head injury than any other moderate activity is precisely what I take issue with. I'd bet good money that showering, walking up stairs, and even driving a car are all at least as dangerous to the ol' noggin.