3 ms·
A person seeing it would reasonably conclude that the claim wasn't specific to this exact situation, which makes this misleading, but not technically lying. (I
by jefftk 4y ago
A person seeing it would reasonably conclude that the claim wasn't specific to this exact situation, which makes this misleading, but not technically lying.
(I still think it's bad, and am not a Tesla fan)
- Jensson 4y agoIt is a lie by omission, some facts are so important to a statement that eliding them is lying. You can't just say that the driver wasn't necessary when he had to intervene in your other tests, it is like saying that the safety net for your line dancer isn't needed even though he would have fallen and died many times over without it. Such lies kills people.