3 ms·
Occam's razor says, no. The simpler explanation is, our reality is as it appears. The deeper questions concern consciousness. At the core I personally don't be
by clownvorld 4y ago
Occam's razor says, no. The simpler explanation is, our reality is as it appears.
The deeper questions concern consciousness. At the core I personally don't believe actors in a simulation can have consciousness, therefore simulations have no bearing on our reality.
- LargoLasskhyfv 4y agoIs that so? What about https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calculating_Space https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calculating_Space & https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergence ? Things like the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_the_Dead https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_the_Dead , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Life https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Life , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akashic_records https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akashic_records , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popol_Vuh https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popol_Vuh , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bardo_Thodol https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bardo_Thodol , could be considered as tries to describe emergent phenomena, depending on Occam's mood and fitness of the day, OR as the initial random seed of who/what created these. As could be https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egregore https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egregore , indepedent of initial origin, just by emergence itself.