3 ms·
No one is banning client-side code execution — they are banning tracking without consent. Bad for advertisers, but good for everyone else.
by perilunar 4y ago
No one is banning client-side code execution — they are banning tracking without consent. Bad for advertisers, but good for everyone else.
- XCSme 4y agoBut isn't this the other way around? Like, they should ban platform X or Y, but make sure that the website respects the privacy laws. I don't think it's even fair to single out specific companies, each website owner should do whatever they want and make sure themselves that are respecting the law. The law can't say platforms X and Y are banned, and the webmaster simply goes with the recently released platform Z that is yet to be banned. I think that user data should never be sent to any third party without explicit user consent, but first-party data storage should be allowed if it used for legitimate business interest (e.g. improving the product usability, performance or stability).
- klntsky 4y ago> good for everyone else Content creators are tied economically to advertisers.
- perilunar 4y agoOnly the ones that advertise.